Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lisa the Kitten's avatar

Orlando - what you and Todd and so many others feel is totally understandable. And you ask an excellent and really important question.

Here's my response (for what it's worth) - I'm pushing 60 and growing up in the S.F. Bay Area since the early 70s, I've seen and been through some sh*t: the Patty Hearst kidnapping and subsequent Stockholm Syndrome Terrorism; back-to-back - Jonestown AND the Milk/Moscone assassination (and subsequent rightful fury and horror at the Dan White verdict); assassination attempts on Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan; the assassination of John Lennon - and so on, and so on, and so on (I won't bore you any further with the entire list).

Things often seemed equally confusing, infuriating, terrifying, and dark (if not more so - we're far more inured to strange new sh*t these days than back then) . . . the difference is that it also wasn't raining down on you via the internet and/or social media - which is essentially "push" technology - like an information highway mudslide. You could "pull" down the news and information at a rate which worked best for your needs and ability to process the resulting feelings.

So that is how I deal with the current challenging times we continue to find ourselves in. I have sharply throttled back my Facebook; I quit Twitter cold turkey when Bond-villain-in-training, Elon Musk took it over; I eschew TikTok, Snapchat and pretty much all other social media platforms. Even when I am on Facebook - it's really only to catch up with the people in my life whom I already know and care about. I just can't go down the rabbit hole of doomscrolling any more.

BUT - I also am pleased to be a paid online subscriber to the NYT, Washington Post, The Atlantic, New York Magazine, and our local little paper up here in the Sierra foothills . . . because you're EXACTLY correct in that it's not just important, but CRUCIAL that we stay informed - and informed by experts (not by BS heresay and rumor-mongering on the socials).

I just pull down the news/information at a rate which allows me to take it in, process it, then formulate a response (vs. a kneejerk REACTION) and/or action plan. I find that this enables and empowers me to be in some semblance of control over this and not feel like this news onslaught is controlling me - AND I'm still getting vital information.

But, this may not meet everyone's individual needs and ability to absorb/process. IMMV and you gotta find what works for you . . . I just hope that smart, capable, caring people like Todd and yourself are able to at least tiptoe back into the fold of news recipients (if not junkies).

Expand full comment
Eliza's avatar

I think sometimes it’s easy to equate “feeling bad” with “doing something.” Reading about all the bad shit that’s happening and being upset about it feels virtuous, in the same way that telling everybody about your big plan to do X makes you feel prematurely accomplished. But if you’re not actually doing anything with that information, it just kind of turns into misery for misery’s sake, with a side helping of guilt that you’re not doing anything or helplessness because you don’t know what to do.

The news is so unrelentingly terrible right now that I think a lot of people have decided to hop off the misery train. It’s hard to know what to do—we can all go to city council meetings, but that’s not going to re-legalize abortion in Texas. I think it’s okay to evaluate your resources (material, emotional, or otherwise) and decide whether you’re able to take some kind of action or not. If you’re not, it’s okay to take a break from everything. Just find a progressive group whose ideals align with yours and follow their voting guide every election.

Expand full comment
29 more comments...

No posts